Home Criminal Defense Afternoon Briefs: Future civil rights attorneys win scholarships; LSAC-funded pipeline program seeks...

Afternoon Briefs: Future civil rights attorneys win scholarships; LSAC-funded pipeline program seeks requests for proposals

131
0

News Roundup

Afternoon Briefs: Future civil rights attorneys win scholarships; LSAC-funded pipeline program seeks requests for proposals

Future civil rights attorneys obtain scholarships

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund has named the primary 10 “Marshall-Motley Scholars,” who will obtain regulation faculty scholarships in alternate for a commitment to serve as civil rights attorneys primarily based within the South for eight years. The students embrace former interns within the White House, the Congressional Black Caucus, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Equal Justice Initiative. Hundreds of individuals utilized for the scholarships. (NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund press release, Law.com, NPR)

Pipeline program funded by LSAC looking for regulation faculty requests for proposals

The Law School Admission Council is looking for requests for proposals from regulation colleges for its PreLaw Undergraduate Scholars Programs. Known because the PLUS Program, it funds regulation faculty choices centered on serving to folks fascinated with changing into attorneys. It’s focused at rising undergraduate sophomores and juniors from teams which might be underrepresented within the authorized group, however anybody can apply, in accordance with the LSAC web site. (Law School Admission Council website)

SCOTUS will think about ineffective help situation

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to think about whether or not habeas courts can think about proof outdoors the state-court file when a defendant claims that they obtained ineffective help at trial and after conviction. The Supreme Court had dominated in 2012 in Martinez v. Ryan that ineffective help by an appellate lawyer can excuse a failure to boost an ineffective trial counsel declare. The cert petition filed by Arizona in two homicide instances, captioned Shinn v. Ramirez, claims that federal regulation bars improvement of proof in a evaluation on the deserves of the ineffective help declare. A short filed by public defenders within the new case claims that the proof would particularly must be launched, and the state’s “real complaint is with this court’s decision in Martinez v. Ryan.” (U.S. Supreme Court order list, SCOTUSblog, the SCOTUSblog case page, the cert petition, the brief in opposition)

Supreme Court accepts case on evaluation of arbitration awards

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to choose whether or not federal courts have the ability to substantiate or vacate arbitration awards under the Federal Arbitration Act when the underlying dispute entails a federal situation. The case is Badgerow v. Walters. (U.S. Supreme Court order list, SCOTUSblog, Courthouse News Service, the SCOTUSblog case page, the cert petition)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here