Home Criminal Defense Analytics Didn’t Help The Tampa Bay Rays, But Can It Help The...

Analytics Didn’t Help The Tampa Bay Rays, But Can It Help The Legal Profession?


Last evening, the Los Angeles Dodgers beat the Tampa Bay Rays to win the 2020 World Series. It was the Dodgers’ first title in 32 years. One fateful resolution modified the momentum of the sport.

For the primary six innings, Tampa Bay had a 1-Zero lead. This was as a result of their beginning pitcher, Cy Young Award-winning Blake Snell was doing very well. He struck out 9 and gave up solely two hits. His efficiency was in comparison with Hall of Famer Sandy Koufax.

But on the sixth inning, proper after Snell gave up a base hit, Rays supervisor Kevin Cash changed him with Nick Anderson. This resolution backfired as Anderson gave up two runs on that inning together with one attributable to a wild pitch. Unfortunately for Tampa Bay, they have been unable to get better from this.

I don’t keep track of baseball so I used to be confused by Cash’s resolution. I didn’t suppose a pitcher could be substituted out after gifting away solely two hits. I believed substitutions occurred when a participant was dropping his edge and giving up quite a few hits and runs.

I used to be instructed that the supervisor changed Snell seemingly as a result of he relied on analytics. There is an enormous trove of information on baseball statistics, equivalent to video games performed, the outcomes, and participant attributes. All of this data is analyzed and synthesized to offer groups recommendation and decide who’s more likely to win a sure game and when a pitcher needs to be relieved. There is even a time period for it: Sabremetrics. I suppose it’s not much totally different than watching two laptop AIs play one another on a baseball game on video system.

The drawback is that analytics isn’t foolproof, as Tampa Bay discovered the painful manner final evening. In reality, if each staff used analytics to plan their season, just one staff will profit whereas the remainder will both should get totally different gamers or a extra strong AI that may synthesize the information higher.

This made me surprise about what is the cost the authorized occupation depends on their very own analytics when making choices.

We depend on precedent to foretell how an analogous case will likely be determined. We analyze a choose’s previous choices to arrange briefs and oral arguments that may persuade the choose to rule in our favor. We vet a juror based mostly on race, formal training, social and financial standing, and a bunch of different components to see if they are going to be sympathetic to our consumer. The opposing counsel’s lawyer’s repute and accomplishments might additionally play a task on methods to proceed with the case.

With creating AI and machine discovering applied sciences, the evaluation will likely be extra detailed. They will take a look at courtroom choices, legislation evaluate articles, judges’ speeches, an lawyer’s Yelp opinions and every other data they will discover on the net.

Another drawback is entry. The richer legislation corporations will seemingly be the early adopters of this expertise and can use it to their shoppers’ benefit. While smaller corporations with extra modest or indigent shoppers must wait till the expertise meets their worth level. This unfairness is nothing new. The richer should buy extra assets as a result of they’ve the cash to do it.

So let’s say a lawyer has a powerful case, and he thinks he’s more likely to win at trial. But what if the “analytics” say that the choose will seemingly rule towards his motions? Or the AI program thinks the jury will seemingly rule towards his consumer? Of course, nobody can say. Just as nobody can inform whether or not Tampa Bay would have gained through a win final evening if Blake Snell had stayed within the game.

Relying on analytics may not get you the outcome you need. Whether it’s litigation or transactional work, there are numerous shifting elements at play. Some elements we will predict with nice accuracy whereas others are a crapshoot. Judges and jurors are human beings and may change. Attorneys can lose their edge or turn out to be higher as time passes. Economies and legal guidelines can change.

In the long run, individuals and professionals will rely extra on analytic information to assist information their choices. But analytics continues to be at greatest an informed guess. In a altering and unpredictable world, it’d nonetheless be higher to depend on your instinct, particularly if it has served you well up to now.

Steven Chung is a tax lawyer in Los Angeles, California. He helps individuals with fundamental tax planning and resolve tax disputes. He can also be sympathetic to individuals with giant pupil loans. He could be reached by way of e mail at sachimalbe@excite.com. Or you possibly can join with him on Twitter (@stevenchung) and join with him on LinkedIn.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here