Home Immigration Lawyer Big City Newspaper Runs Op-ed Questioning Why “Habitual Drunkenness” Should Be a...

Big City Newspaper Runs Op-ed Questioning Why “Habitual Drunkenness” Should Be a Disqualification for Citizenship

101
0

The headline within the Philadelphia Inquirer’s opinion page stopped me in my tracks. ‘Habitual drunkenness’ is not a reason to deny someone like me U.S. citizenship, it learn. I checked once more to guarantee that I used to be truly taking a look at a very powerful newspaper within the nation’s sixth largest metropolis, and had not accidently (drunkenly) stumbled over to The Onion’s web site.

No, I used to be nonetheless on the Inquirer’s web site, and the opinion column was not written by somebody who had downed a number of too many at a neighborhood tavern (the bars are all closed attributable to COVID, in any occasion) and wandered into paper’s constructing. It was authored by one Abraham Gutman, a employees editorial author whom the paper (presumably) pays to pen sober commentary on essential points.

Gutman has lived within the
United States for all of 9 years and goes by way of the method of
changing into a citizen and making ready for the citizenship take a look at, which he describes
as, “costly, discriminatory and simply acquired much tougher to move due to
Donald Trump.” (Apparently newspaper editors can’t deal with highschool civics
questions – however cheer up, Mr. Gutman, not less than there’s no math on the take a look at.)
But whereas he was cramming for the examination, one query “caught me off guard,” he
says: Have you EVER been a ordinary drunkard?

“I discovered the road of
questioning on drug and alcohol use, and the complete train of thought of a medical
checkup, off-putting,” he writes. “It’s time to delete questions on drug and
alcohol use on immigration functions.” Because, why wouldn’t we need to make
residents out of out of the country drug addicts and alcoholics? Don’t we need to be
inclusive?

Substance abuse is a
illness (although in some unspecified time in the future within the course of it intertwined private selection), and
we must always not make gentle of it, or lack compassion for individuals who wrestle with
dependency. But that doesn’t imply that when a nation considers individuals for
citizenship that it shouldn’t have in mind ethical character, together with an
expectation that the applicant is more likely to be habitually productive and
habitually sober.

More than something,
Gutman’s column describing assessments of ethical character in contemplating
citizenship functions to be “archaic,” and the truth that these opinions are
given house on the pages of a serious U.S. day by day newspaper, speaks volumes about
elitist contempt for the nation and the core values that made it nice. It is
indicative of why so lots of our elite are for what quantities to open borders.

Gutman by no means tells us how he answered the query about whether or not he’s a “habitual drunkard.” But maybe he was impressed by the scene within the 1942 classic film, Casablanca (set, appropriately, in a bar), wherein Major Strasser, a Nazi officer, interrogates Rick Blaine the American nightclub proprietor (performed by Humphrey Bogart) within the presence of Captain Renault, the obedient Vichy French prefect:

Major Strasser: What is your nationality?

Rick Blaine: I’m a drunkard.

Captain Renault: That makes Rick a citizen of the world.

Life imitates artwork.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here