Tennessee youngster assist case abstract on enforcement.
The events to this Greene County, Tennessee, had been married for 16 years and had been the mother and father of two minor youngsters. They had been dentists who practiced collectively till the spouse’s incapacity. After the spouse filed for divorce, they had been in a position to resolve most points, and in 2017, the court docket authorized their marital dissolution settlement and everlasting parenting plan.
The husband was ordered to pay youngster assist of $3000 monthly.
In 2018, the spouse filed a movement alleging that the husband hadn’t paid the complete youngster assist obligation, and different allegations. A listening to was held earlier than a particular grasp, and the court docket authorized the particular grasp’s report. The husband appealed to the Tennessee Court docket of Appeals.
The court docket of appeals first addressed division of sure accounts. It then turned to the query of whether or not the husband ought to have been credited for premiums paid on an entire life insurance coverage coverage belonging to the spouse. The premiums had been over $44,000, and the particular grasp had given the husband credit score for under half this quantity. The appeals court docket held that he was not entitled to any credit score. Nonetheless, because the spouse had not appealed this concern, the husband was allowed to maintain the 50% credit score.
The court docket then turned to the difficulty of whether or not the husband had made funds for the youngsters’s medical payments as required by the decree. The husband argued that he was not notified of those bills in a well timed vogue. Nonetheless, the appeals court docket rigorously reviewed the proof and held that he was nonetheless required to pay.
The court docket then addressed points relating to automotive insurance coverage, because the events had agreed to pay car bills for the youngsters. The daddy argued that he ought to have obtained credit score for locating lower-priced automotive insurance coverage that what the mom obtained. Nonetheless, the appeals court docket famous that he hadn’t offered proof of the alleged decrease price.
Lastly, the daddy argued that he ought to have obtained credit score for one of many month’s youngster assist, since he incurred vital bills for the youngsters throughout that month. Nonetheless, after reviewing the proof, the appeals court docket agreed that he was not entitled to the credit score as a matter of regulation.
For these causes, the Court docket of Appeals affirmed the decrease court docket’s judgment.
No. E2019-01035-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Might 29, 2020).
See unique opinion for precise language. Authorized citations omitted.
To be taught extra, see Child Support Collection & Enforcement in Tennessee.
See additionally Tennessee Parenting Plans and Child Support Worksheets: Building a Constructive Future for Your Family that includes precise examples of parenting plans and youngster assist worksheets from actual instances out there on Amazon.com.