Image from Shutterstock.com.
Departing attorneys who downloaded a “treasure trove” of proprietary supplies from their Boston regulation agency could also be responsible for unfair or misleading enterprise practices, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has dominated.
The courtroom dominated for the Governo Law Firm in its lawsuit in opposition to a bunch of nonequity companions who at first made a proposal to purchase Governo after which began apply at their new regulation a day after their provide was rejected. The attorneys had already integrated the brand new regulation agency, CMBG3, they usually used the downloaded supplies of their apply, in line with the courtroom’s April 9 opinion.
According to Holland & Knight, the choice seems to be the primary occasion through which a courtroom deemed this sort of conduct to create attainable legal responsibility under a state’s misleading practices legal guidelines.
“Taking materials developed by or for the firm at the firm’s expense may create risks to the attorney and the attorney’s new firm under consumer protection laws,” the alert mentioned.
Governo represented insurance coverage corporations in asbestos litigation. The attorneys began secretly downloading the analysis library, databases and administrative recordsdata onto high-capacity thumb drives in October 2016. It price greater than $100,000 to construct the library and the identical quantity to construct the databases, in line with the opinion.
The downloaded analysis library consisted of greater than 100,000 paperwork pertinent to asbestos litigation, together with witness interviews, skilled reviews and investigative reviews. The searchable databases included scientific data. The administrative recordsdata included advertising supplies and shopper lists.
In June 2019, jurors awarded the Governo Law Firm $900,000 on claims of conversion, conspiracy and breach of the obligation of loyalty. But jurors didn’t discover legal responsibility on a declare of unfair or misleading commerce practices.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court mentioned Governo is entitled to a brand new trial on the commerce practices declare due to faulty jury directions by the trial choose. The choose wrongly mentioned jurors couldn’t think about copying of paperwork whereas they had been nonetheless employed at Governo.
“Where an employee misappropriates his or her employer’s proprietary materials during the course of employment and then uses the purloined materials in the marketplace, that conduct is not purely an internal matter; rather, it comprises a marketplace transaction that may give rise to a claim” under the commerce practices regulation, the courtroom mentioned.
“Had they not been told to disregard this conversion, the jury could have found that the defendants’ subsequent use of the converted materials was an unfair or deceptive act, rendering the defendants liable.”
The Governo Law Firm’s proprietor, David Governo, is now a companion with the Boston agency Smith Duggan Buell & Rufo, in line with the Boston Business Journal. An online notice on the Governo Law Firm’s web site says different Governo attorneys and workers members additionally moved to Smith Duggan.