Home Legal Advice Invention of a Slave: 2021 Redux

Invention of a Slave: 2021 Redux


by Dennis Crouch

Tormasi v. Western Digital, Docket No. 20-1396 (Supreme Court 2021)

Walter Tormasi is a prisoner within the New Jersey state jail system. He is serving a life sentence for murdering his mom when he was 16 years outdated after apparently receiving encouragement from his father, Attila.

Tormasi can be a patentee.  His U.S. Patent No. 7,324,301 covers a personal computer hard-drive that permits for “simultaneously and independently” studying and/or writing on completely different provider surfaces inside the drive.   The patent appears pretty sharp.  Although Tormasi started the prosecution professional se, he later labored with John Kane, a Trenton-based patent legal professional, to push by to issuance.

In 2019 Tormasi sued Western Digital within the N.D. Cal — asserting that the defendant’s dual-actuator drives infringed Tormasi’s patents. Rather than reaching the deserves, the district courtroom dismissed the case on procedural grounds.  The district courtroom dominated that Tormasi lacked the capability to sue and the Federal Circuit then affirmed.  The majority opinion is per curiam from Judges Wallach and Chen.  Judge Stoll wrote in dissent.

Capacity to Sue: Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a plaintiff’s capability to sue is set “by the law of the individual’s domicile.”  For Tormasi, that’s New Jersey.  New Jersey has a statute on level: “Every person who has reached the age of majority . . . and has the mental capacity may prosecute or defend any action in any court.” N.J. STAT. ANN. § 2A:15-1 (2013).  However, New Jersey’s Prison Administrative Code units forth rules that prohibit prisoners from “operating a business … without the approval of the Administrator” N.J. ADMIN. CODE § 10A:4-4.1.   Tormasi doesn’t have the Adminstrator’s approval.  The courts discovered that this non-statutory administrative rule was adequate to restrict the state statute — superseding his proper to file a lawsuit in his private capability.  It appears to me that rule eliminating a celebration’s proper to file a civil lawsuit in all probability ought to have been a bit extra direct.

Tormasi represented himself professional se on the district and appellate courtroom ranges. However, Thomas Lewry and his workforce at Brooks Kushman not too long ago took-up the case and have petitioned for Supreme Court evaluate.

Three questions introduced:

1. Does imprisonment (1) forfeit a patent proprietor’s proper to not be disadvantaged of private property with out due technique of legislation and (2) render an individual wholly the ultimate safety of the legislation?

2. Does Lewis v. Casey, stating that the precise of entry to the courts “does not guarantee inmates the wherewithal to transform themselves into litigating engines,” allow state businesses to affirmatively get rid of an inmate’s entry to courtroom on normal civil issues?

3. The patent statute authorizes patent house owners to implement their constitutionally acknowledged  exclusionary rights in federal courtroom. Did the decrease courts create a harmful slippery slope that (1) establishes a mechanism by which states can, through an administrative rule, nullify federally granted statutory rights and (2) oppresses prisoners by depriving them of property with out redress?

SupremeCourtCertiorariPetition (Appendix) (Fed. Cir. Decision)

I might add a fourth query specializing in the actual patent statute: 35 U.S.C. § 281, which expressly offers a treatment for patent infringement to the patentee: “A patentee shall have remedy by civil action for infringement of his patent.” As interpreted by the Federal Circuit, the foundations of process are in heated discussion with this statute and one of many two should bend.

Still, maybe the reply comes inside the 13th Amendment’s pronouncement that slavery continues to be permitted inside the United States “as a punishment for crime.”

At the Supreme Court, responsive briefing is due from Western Digital by May 28, 2021.  Joining Lewry on the transient are REZA ROGHANI ESFAHANIDUSTIN ZAK, and LEROY ASHLEY.

NJ Law Limiting Patentee’s Capacity to Sue Upheld on Appeal

Invention of a Slave and the Ongoing Movement For Equal Justice


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here