Vice President Kamala Harris just lately traveled to Guatemala
and Mexico to debate the “root causes” of migration with authorities officers
within the area.
Although there was already minimal confidence in Harris’ means to successfully tackle the humanitarian disaster on the southern border, she managed to additional decrease expectations. Harris’ first excursion abroad was as dangerous because it may get and confirmed that the United States (as well as Guatemala and Mexico) shouldn’t have any confidence in her means to guide regional migration methods and safe the southern border.
Harris’ excursion abroad began rocky earlier than she even landed in Guatemala. In a CBS interview that aired the day earlier than her go to to the nation, Guatemalan President Alejandro Giammattei stated that he and Harris had been “not on the same side of the coin” on migration and that his administration “asked the United States government to send more of a clear message to prevent more people from leaving.”
Immediately after touchdown in Guatemala, Harris was met with an disagreeable welcome. Large crowds of Guatemalan residents held indicators with messages including ‘Kamala Go Home,’ ‘Kamala Mind Your Own Business’, and ‘We Reject Your 860 Million Dollar Bribe to Our Corrupt Politicians.’
Soon after touchdown, Harris made joint remarks with President Giammattei (who told her to put on a COVID masks in entrance of him) that additionally obtained criticism. Harris instructed Guatemalans to not come to the U.S. border and that the U.S. will proceed to enforce its laws and secure its border. This message confused many as Harris has repeatedly advocated for migrants to return to the southern border, Tweeting in 2017 that “Everyone is welcome here.”
Her phrases probably satisfied nobody, because the administration’s deeds clearly point out that coming to the United States illegally can be rewarded. At the identical time, she managed to incur the wrath of the ascendant far left wing of the Democrat Party, most notably Rep. Alexandra Ocasio Cortez, who referred to as it disappointing.
The excursion additional spiraled downward throughout an exclusive TV interview with NBC’s Lester Holt. Holt requested Harris if she had any plans to go to the southern border to get a firsthand have a look at what is occurring. Harris grew to become flustered and acknowledged, “We’ve been to the border. We’ve been to the border.” To which Holt identified, “You have haven’t been to the border.” The vp smugly responded, “…and I haven’t been to Europe. I don’t understand the point that you’re making.”
The tone-deaf assertion from Harris triggered a flurry of articles, movies, memes, and different media worldwide. It grew to become some of the embarrassing moments of her time as vp as she appeared to be unaware of the record number of migrant youngsters held in federal custody and the ever-expanding human and drug smuggling industries occurring on the border under her management.
The following day, Harris traveled to Mexico to fulfill with
Mexican President Manuel Lopez Obrador, additionally to debate and tackle the “root
causes” of migration. But the excursion additionally obtained dangerous critiques.
Harris’ go to to Mexico got here simply after the nation’s violence-marred midterm elections. One Mexican authorities official referred to as her go to “not ideal.” Sergio de la Pena, who served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Western Hemisphere Affairs, said that “Whenever you do visits like this, you take a look at what issues are taking place in the partner nation she want to go visit (sic), or whatever country you want to go visit – so why would you show up immediately after an election on Sunday for a visit on Tuesday?”
Harris left Mexico agreeing to a $130 million dedication over the subsequent three years from the U.S. to assist labor reforms in Mexico and loans to bolster southern Mexico’s financial system—regardless of overseas support displaying little to no affect on curbing unlawful migration.
Vice President Kamala Harris’ first abroad excursion didn’t go well, to say the least. She didn’t obtain heat welcomes. Her messaging remained complicated. She appeared tone-deaf on nationwide tv. Her consciousness of overseas coverage and customs lacked. And the agreements she signed proceed to do little to successfully tackle the scenario on the southern border. Her excursion can solely be seen as a failure and affirmation that’s she the mistaken individual to guide the trouble to repair one of many worst border and humanitarian crises in historical past.