Home Civil Law Tamihere Vs. Hosking – Being A Skilled Lawyer Helped

Tamihere Vs. Hosking – Being A Skilled Lawyer Helped


Lawyer John Tamihere claimed his background as a lawyer helped in his acquiring of a settlement over defamatory claims made by NZME-owned Newstalk ZB host Mike Hosking.

Tamihere vs. Hosking - Being a Trained Lawyer Helped 13

John Tamihere outside Auckland High Court.

NZ Herald Pic. Photograph: RNZ / Anneke Smith

Tamihere obtained his Courtroom-ordered apology within the Excessive Courtroom, learn by lawyer Alan Ringwood, Bell Gully media lawyer and litigator. Ringwood mentioned it accepted Te Pou Matakana was entitled to obtain the funds and pay out the sums that it did to its shareholders. The radio station then apologised over feedback Hosking made implying the Māori Occasion co-leader had personally benefited from Whānau Ora funding to the tune of $600,000 which was not the case.

Hosking apologised on the air right this moment.

The decision of Justice Lang final September.

“You’ll be able to’t maintain your head up so you must defend your self. I’m fortunate sufficient to be a educated lawyer with sufficient assets to defend myself; lots of Māori don’t,” Tamihere mentioned.

“What I can say is that contribution of some significance will probably be made to the Māori Occasion election marketing campaign and you may thank Mike Hosking for that.”

Right this moment’s apology is about feedback Hosking made about funds that had been made by the North Island Whānau Ora commissioning company Te Pou Matakana in December 2018.

Te Pou Matakana had obtained funds from the Ministry of Māori Growth, Te Puni Kōkiri, and had paid that cash out to its shareholders.

“The way in which by which the merchandise was worded may have been taken to imply that John Tamihere personally benefitted from the funds.

Newstalk ZB accepts that Tamihere didn’t profit personally from the funds and sincerely apologises to John Tamihere,” Ringwood mentioned.

Exterior courtroom Tamihere mentioned he hoped Hosking and his bosses had learnt racially stereotyping others was fallacious.

“I feel it sends a message to mainstream broadcasters, notably very highly effective manufacturers, that racial stereotyping just isn’t proper as a result of it casts suspicion on all Māori round monetary transactions and it’s simply not proper.”

He mentioned he had provided to resolve the dispute “the Kiwi means” with an apology over a beer however needed to take it to courtroom to clear his identify.

“You’ve obtained to carry your mana in your communities. You’ll be able to’t stroll round you communities up and down the nation with them believing that you simply’ve obtained your fingers of their until. That was the allegation.

Learn Extra LawFuel NZ Information Right here


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here