Home Immigration Lawyer The Actual Menace to the US Economic system is Trump’s Proclamation, Not...

The Actual Menace to the US Economic system is Trump’s Proclamation, Not the Nonimmigrant Staff it Bans | | The Insightful Immigration Weblog


By Cyrus D. Mehta and Kaitlyn Field*

President Trump has mastered the Darkish Arts of immigration bans. On June 22, 2020, Trump signed one more Presidential Proclamation additional proscribing immigration into the USA. The brand new proclamation is an extension of the previous proclamation issued on April 22, 2020 that suspends sure inexperienced card purposes and limits extremely expert employees and several other nonimmigrant visa classes. The proclamation is efficient as of June 24, 2020 and expires on December 31, 2020. The proclamation could also be modified throughout this era as deemed needed.

The Proclamation supposedly cites a want to protect jobs for American employees and excessive unemployment charges within the face of the COVID-19 pandemic as a rationale for suspending the entry of sure inexperienced card candidates and extremely expert employees. It states with none basis “American employees compete in opposition to international nationals for jobs in each sector of our financial system, together with in opposition to hundreds of thousands of aliens who enter the USA to carry out momentary work.  Momentary employees are sometimes accompanied by their spouses and kids, a lot of whom additionally compete in opposition to American employees.  Underneath atypical circumstances, correctly administered momentary employee packages can present advantages to the financial system.  However beneath the extraordinary circumstances of the financial contraction ensuing from the COVID-19 outbreak, sure nonimmigrant visa packages authorizing such employment pose an uncommon menace to the employment of American employees”. In actuality, nonetheless, each this Proclamation and the April Proclamation that it expands upon are a part of a broader technique by the Trump administration geared toward curbing all immigration.

International nationals who have been outdoors the USA on the efficient date of the proclamation (June 24, 2020), do not need a nonimmigrant visa or different official immigration doc (comparable to a transportation letter, an acceptable boarding foil, or an advance parole doc) that’s legitimate on that date, and are looking for to acquire an H-1B visa, H-2B visa, L visa or sure classes of the J visa are barred. Moreover, accompanying or following to affix dependents looking for to acquire H-4, L-2, or J-2 visas who have been outdoors the U.S. on the efficient date are additionally barred. Nonetheless, if the principal H-1B, H-2B, J-1, or L-1 beneficiary is already in the USA, or in any other case exempt (see under), it’s unclear at the moment whether or not this bar will apply to dependents who will subsequently apply for H-4, L-2, or J-2 visas on the U.S. Consulate.

The Proclamation doesn’t apply to: anybody who was inside the USA on June 24, 2020, people who’re outdoors the USA and have a nonimmigrant visa or different official immigration doc (comparable to a transportation letter, an acceptable boarding foil, or an advance parole doc) that’s legitimate on June 24, 2020, Lawful everlasting residents of the USA (inexperienced card holders), spouses and kids of U.S. residents, people looking for to enter the USA to supply momentary labor or important to the USA meals provide chain; and anybody whose entry can be within the nationwide curiosity as decided by the Departments of Homeland Safety and State. CBP headquarters has confirmed that Canadians getting into as H, L or J nonimmigrants are exempt from the proclamation.

The Proclamation additionally appears to depart open the door for different measures geared toward proscribing the entry of sure classes of immigrants, and even taking motion in opposition to people who’ve already been admitted. Part 5(b) of the Proclamation states that: “The Secretary of Labor shall, in session with the Secretary of Homeland Safety, as quickly as practicable, and in keeping with relevant legislation, think about promulgating laws or take different acceptable motion to make sure that the presence in the USA of aliens who’ve been admitted or in any other case offered a profit, or who’re looking for admission or a profit, pursuant to an EB-2 or EB-Three immigrant visa or an H-1B nonimmigrant visa doesn’t drawback United States employees in violation of part 212(a)(5)(A) or (n)(1) of the INA (eight U.S.C. 1182(a)(5)(A) or (n)(1))”.  INA 212(a)(5) renders a international nationwide who seeks to enter the USA to carry out expert or unskilled labor is inadmissible except it has decided that there aren’t a adequate variety of US employees who’re certified for a similar job and the employment of such international nationals won’t have an effect on the wages and dealing situations of US employees. Most international nationals have already acquired labor certifications after their employers unsuccessfully performed a recruitment of U.S. employees within the labor market.   Although this provision doesn’t have any current impact, it appears to allow the administration to take additional actions to restrict the variety of immigrant visa employees in the USA. One may even think about the provision being invoked to rescind some individuals’ approved labor certifications and I-140 visa petitions, ought to the administration determine to take action sooner or later. This might have a devastating influence on the lots of of 1000’s of individuals born in India who’ve been ready for inexperienced playing cards within the EB-2 and EB-Three backlogs. In fact, such an motion can be challenged in courtroom since INA 204(j) has particularly allowed adjustment of standing candidates whose purposes have been pending for greater than 180 days to “port” to new employers and nonetheless maintain intact their labor certifications and I-140 visa petitions. Thus, there are provisions within the INA that ponder that when the labor market has been examined, the check needn’t be repeated over and over, even when the international nationwide’s inexperienced card has been delayed as a result of  EB-2 and EB-Three backlogs.

One other insidious provision within the Proclamation, part 4(c)(ii), directs the DHS in keeping with relevant legislation to “stop sure aliens who’ve remaining orders of elimination; who’re inadmissible or deportable from the USA; or who’ve been arrested for, charged with, or convicted of a felony offense in the USA, from acquiring eligibility to work in the USA.” Whereas there are present provisions within the INA that deem international nationals inadmissible for all the above causes, one who has been charged or arrested of a felony offense shouldn’t be disadvantaged of eligibility to work in the USA if the costs have been dismissed or proved baseless, and the international nationwide didn’t admit to the important parts of against the law that will render him/her inadmissible.

The Proclamation stands to have a devastating influence on people in a wide range of situations.  Resulting from quite a few journey restrictions which have been put in place because of COVID-19, many people could have left the USA with a legitimate visa that has expired whereas which have been trapped outdoors the nation. Underneath the brand new Proclamation, these people wouldn’t be capable of reenter the USA. Relations of a principal visa holder are prone to be equally impacted. One such state of affairs arises when a principal visa holder was in the USA on the efficient date of the Proclamation, however has dependent relations who’re at present outdoors the U.S. with no legitimate visa. As a result of people who have been inside the USA on June 24th, 2020 are exempt from the proclamation, David Isaacson is of the opinion that  relations of a person who’s in the USA aren’t “accompanying or following to affix” a person whose entry is suspended. Thus, spouses and kids of a person who’s exempt from the Proclamation ought to arguably be capable of reenter the USA, however one doesn’t have any religion whether or not Trump’s State Division will agree with this completely cheap interpretation. Certainly, though the proclamation clearly states that it’s going to not apply to 1 who was current in the USA on June 24, 2020, the State Division appears to be indicating on Twitter that if such an individual leaves, a visa won’t be issued through the validity of the proclamation. This appears to be inconsistent with a plain studying of Part 3(i) that states that the proclamation will apply to a person who “is outdoors the USA on the efficient date of this proclamation.”

The state of affairs is extra sophisticated when reversed, nonetheless, with a principal visa holder, for instance an H-1B, overseas and his/her H-Four partner is in the USA. It’s unclear how the Proclamation would apply to the H-Four partner on this state of affairs. Even when the H-Four partner at present is in legitimate standing, they might solely be capable of stay in the USA for a restricted time period earlier than being deemed to be in violation of their standing. The USCIS allows dependents of nonimmigrant visa holders to stay in the USA whereas the principal is briefly outdoors the nation. On the similar time, USCIS stop the “parking” of dependents in the USA for prolonged intervals of time if the principal nonimmigrant employee solely comes for infrequent work visits.    Thus, if the H-1B is stranded overseas for a number of months till the tip of the ban, which may probably be prolonged past the tip of 2020 relying on who wins within the presidential election this November, the H-Four partner could not be thought-about to be in legitimate standing. If the principal H-1B partner’s job has been terminated, this is able to imperil the standing of the H-Four partner and kids even sooner.

As with the April Proclamation, Trump relied on part 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to ban nonimmigrant employees. Though Trump additionally derived authority from 212(f) to subject the journey bans, the third iteration of which was upheld by the US Supreme Courtroom in Trump v. Hawaii, there could also be a foundation to tell apart the newest Proclamations from the journey bans (see Building the Case to Challenge Trump’s Immigration Bans). The president can not wholesale re-write legal guidelines enacted by Congress, and determine the type of immigrant he prefers over one other primarily based on private whim and prejudice (see additionally  Reflecting on the Supreme Court DACA Decision in Comparison to Trump’s Immigration Bans. In its latest resolution on DACA, the Supreme Courtroom held that the administration has to think about reliance pursuits earlier than rescinding a profit beneath the APA). This most up-to-date Proclamation represents one other try by the administration to attract synthetic distinctions between sure classes of immigrants. The J visa class, for instance, is impacted solely “to the extent the alien is collaborating in an intern, trainee, trainer, camp counselor, au pair, or summer time work journey program”. Different classes of J visas have been exempted from the proclamation, together with the coed and alien doctor classes. The Proclamation additionally excludes different classes of nonimmigrant visas, together with treaty dealer (E-1) and investor (E-2) classes, completely. Lawsuits are sure to be filed not simply by H-1B visa holders separated from their households, as they might be probably the most sympathetic plaintiffs, but in addition by massive multinational companies whose extremely positioned government who would in any other case be capable of enter on the L-1A visa has been banned.

In conclusion, this proclamation disproportionately impacts Indians probably the most as they’re the biggest customers of the H-1B visa. It’s no coincidence that in 2016 Steve Bannon, who was then a strategist  to Trump and chairman of Brietbart Information expressed concern that too many  CEOs of profitable Silicon Valley tech corporations have been immigrants from Asia. A lot of them got here to the United on an H-1B, which has been focused by this proclamation. This type of hostility in opposition to immigrants has been expressed incessantly by Trump and his senior advisor Stephen Miller. Brietbart Information, from which Miller and different xenophobes within the Trump administration draw inspiration, has constantly railed against Indian immigrants and H-1B visa holders.  The proclamation won’t defend American jobs by cruelly separating the H-1B employee from the H-Four partner and kids, a lot of them who’ve been within the US for a few years ready for his or her inexperienced playing cards within the EB-2 and EB-Three backlogs. Nor will this proclamation convey again American jobs when it bans a specialised information intracompany transferee on an L-1 visa who had in depth information of an organization’s merchandise and might help it to develop in the USA, which in flip would create extra jobs.   Whereas the proclamation flunks the financial check, for the xenophobe it’s a dream come true because it incorporates an exhaustive want record for proscribing immigration beneath the quilt of the pandemic that will in any other case have been unattainable to go by Congress.

*Kaitlyn Field graduated with a JD from Penn State Regulation in 2020, and works as a legislation clerk at Cyrus D. Mehta & Companions PLLC.




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here