Home Criminal Defense Trump and Giuliani face first civil swimsuit stemming from Capitol riots; violation...

Trump and Giuliani face first civil swimsuit stemming from Capitol riots; violation of KKK Act is alleged


Trials & Litigation

Image from Shutterstock.com.

A Mississippi congressman has filed a civil swimsuit in opposition to former President Donald Trump and lawyer Rudy Giuliani that claims they violated the Ku Klux Klan Act by searching for to intervene with the counting of Electoral College votes.

The Feb. 16 lawsuit by Democratic U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson is the primary civil swimsuit filed in opposition to Trump in reference to the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, report Law.com, the New York Times and CNN.

Thompson is represented by the NAACP and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll.

Other lawsuit defendants are the right-wing extremist teams the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, whose members have been charged within the riots.

“Defendants Trump and Giuliani engaged in a concerted campaign to misinform their supporters and the public, encouraging and promoting intimidation and violence in furtherance of their common plan to promote the reelection of defendant Trump, even after the states had certified election results decisively showing he lost the election,” the swimsuit says.

The swimsuit says Trump is liable in his private capability as a result of he “acted beyond the outer perimeter of his official duties.” The swimsuit seeks damages and an injunction stopping the defendants from future violations of the legislation.

Joseph Sellers, chairman of Cohen Milstein’s civil rights and employment apply, instructed Law.com that the swimsuit cites conduct by Trump that allegedly incited the riots. But the premise for the swimsuit is the allegation that the defendants conspired to intervene with Congress’ responsibility to ratify the election outcomes, he stated.

CNN described the Ku Klux Klan Act as “a scarcely used” legislation that permits civil suits in opposition to those that use “force, intimidation or threat” to forestall officers from upholding the duties of their workplace.

Stephen Vladeck, a professor on the University of Texas School of Law, instructed CNN that the legislation “was specifically meant to provide federal civil remedies for federal officers who were prevented from performing their duties by two or more individuals, whether federal marshals in the post-Civil War South, federal judges in un-reconstructed lower courts or federal legislators.”

Vladeck stated it’s not troublesome to see how the legislation’s provisions “maps onto what happened on Jan. 6,” however the “harder question is whether Trump himself can be connected to that conspiracy.”

Sellers instructed Law.com that the legal professionals and Thompson waited to file the swimsuit till after the impeachment trial to keep away from any distraction. The Senate didn’t get the two-thirds majority wanted to convict Trump, though seven Republican senators voted to convict him.

See additionally:

ABAJournal.com: “Georgia lawyer in Capitol assault says mob was patriotic and heroic”

ABAJournal.com: “Lawyer fired after posting Capitol riot video sues to block ‘illegitimately elected Congress’”

ABAJournal.com: “ABA president condemns mob assault on Capitol as Rep. Gohmert asks SCOTUS to stop Pence”

ABAJournal.com: “Lawyer is arrested in Capitol assault after Facebook bragging”

ABAJournal.com: “Could Trump face charges for speech before Capitol riot? Experts differ on Brandenburg impact”

ABAJournal.com: “Lawyer loses his job after posting video of himself outside Capitol during riot”

ABAJournal.com: “Judge apologizes after posting photo with her husband in Capitol rioter costume”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here