If you hear intently –
actually, actually intently, when the crickets cease chirping – you simply may hear
the sound of Americans clamoring for an enormous amnesty for unlawful aliens. If
you do, you most likely stay in Portland, San Francisco, Brooklyn, or within the neighborhood
of some overly woke faculty campus. Most different locations, individuals’s priorities are
jobs, taxes, secure streets, and even getting our border under management.
One different place you may encounter an obsession with amnesty for unlawful aliens is on the airwaves of the 24-hour cable “news” channels and on the pages of elitist once-great newspapers and magazines. The Fourth Estate has lengthy since ceased to function as an goal supply of data that permits the general public to make up its own thoughts about essential points. But in latest months it has morphed right into a lobbying drive, pushing for enactment of a woke political agenda – by any means essential.
At President Biden’s one (and solely) highly staged “news” conference on March 25, “journalists” brazenly lobbied him to declare his help for altering longstanding Senate guidelines. When President Biden, working off of index playing cards itemizing pre-approved questioners, referred to as on Yamiche Alcindor, the PBS anchor didn’t a lot pose a query, as exhort the president to take a political place. “Why not back a filibuster rule that at least gets around issues, including voting rights or immigration?” she requested passive-aggressively.
The drum beat of “news” media lobbying continues. In the May four version of the Washington Post, columnist Greg Sargent implores Senate Democrats to scrap the rule that requires a 60-vote majority to deliver most laws to the ground for a ultimate vote. Despite holding management of the Senate solely by advantage of Vice President Kamala Harris’ tie-breaking vote, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is reported to be significantly contemplating this selection by attaching large unlawful alien amnesty measures to an already pork-laden infrastructure bill.
Under Senate guidelines, a provision generally known as “reconciliation” might be employed to enact laws that may have a budgetary affect that isn’t “incidental” by a easy 51-vote majority. (In reality, amnesty would have a profound budgetary affect, simply not a really useful one. It would price the general public treasury trillions of dollars over the approaching a long time.) The transfer would additionally run roughshod over one other Senate rule requiring all amendments to a invoice to be germane to the laws being thought-about. Passing off immigrants as “infrastructure” is likely to be a heavy raise, even for the silver-tongued senator from New York.
While Sargent concedes that it’s “unclear whether the Senate parliamentarian will agree that these immigration changes would have budgetary impact” that meets the edge for reconciliation to be invoked, what is obvious is that on the subject of amnesty for unlawful aliens and different woke immigration insurance policies, the elitist media are now not goal observers with a mission to tell the general public. They are full-throated advocates with a mission to jam their political priorities down the throats of the general public.